🔗 Share this article

The number of guaranteed positions for Indigenous council members on NZ councils is set to be slashed by over 50%, after a divisive legislative amendment that required municipal councils to submit the fate of hard-won Indigenous wards to a popular referendum.

Background Information on Indigenous Representation

Indigenous electoral districts, which may have one or more elected officials based on demographic data, were created in 2001 to give Māori electors the choice to vote for a assured Indigenous council member in municipal and provincial governments. Initially, local governments could only establish a Māori ward by initially putting it to a community referendum in their region. Local populations frequently devoted considerable time building community backing and urging their local governments to establish Māori wards.

Legislative Shifts and Government Actions

To remedy the issue, the previous Labour government allowed local councils to establish a Māori ward without first requiring them to put it to a public vote.

However, this year, the current administration reversed the change, saying local residents ought to determine whether to establish Indigenous representation.

Voting Outcomes

The new legislation mandated local authorities that had established a ward under Labour’s rules to hold decisive public votes alongside the local body elections, which concluded on 11 October. Of 42 councils participating in the referendum, 17 decided to keep their seats, and twenty-five to disestablish theirs – showing numerous areas against guaranteed Māori representation.

These outcomes represented “a crucial move in reinstating local democratic control.”

Critics nevertheless have condemned the new policy as “discriminatory” and “against Indigenous interests”. After assuming power, the coalition government has implemented extensive reversals to measures designed to improve Indigenous welfare and political inclusion. Officials has said it aims to end “ethnic-specific” policies, and asserts it is dedicated to improving outcomes for Indigenous people and all New Zealanders.

Geographical Splits

The results of the referendums were divided down city-country divisions – most cities required to vote backed Indigenous seats, while rural regions skewed heavily towards removing them.

“It’s a real shame for the Indigenous seats that had recently been established – they’re just beginning to find their footing.”

Voter Turnout and Criticism

This year’s local government elections recorded the lowest voter turnout in over three decades, with under one-third of citizens casting a vote, leading to calls for an overhaul.

The process had been “a farce”.

Differential Standards

Councils are permitted to establish other types of electoral districts – including rural wards – without initially mandating a community ballot. The disparate requirements applied to Indigenous representation indicated the government was singling out Māori representation.

“Ultimately, they were unsuccessful. Numerous localities have expressed strong opposition.”

This statement concerned the 17 regions that voted to keep their seats.